Everything about Cosmic Background Radiation totally explained
In
cosmology, the
cosmic microwave background radiation (most often referred as acronyms as
CMB but occasionally
CMBR,
CBR or
MBR, also referred to as
relic radiation) is a form of
electromagnetic radiation discovered in 1965 that fills the entire universe. It has a thermal
black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.725
kelvin. Thus the spectrum peaks in the
microwave range at a frequency of 160.2
GHz, corresponding to a wavelength of 1.9 mm.
Most cosmologists consider this radiation to be the best evidence for the
Big Bang model of the universe.
Features
The cosmic microwave background is
isotropic to roughly one part in 100,000: the
root mean square variations are only 18 µK.
The Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (
FIRAS) instrument on the
NASA Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite has carefully measured the spectrum of the cosmic microwave background. FIRAS compared the CMB with a reference
black body and no difference could be seen in their spectra. Any deviations from the black body form that might still remain undetected in the CMB spectrum over the wavelength range from 0.5 to 5 mm must have a weighted
rms value of at most 50 parts per million (0.005%) of the CMB peak brightness. This made the CMB spectrum the most precisely measured black body spectrum in nature.
The cosmic microwave background, and its level of
isotropy, are both predictions of
Big Bang theory. In the theory, the early universe was made up of a hot
plasma of
photons,
electrons and
baryons. The photons were constantly interacting with the plasma through
Thomson scattering. As the universe
expanded, adiabatic cooling caused the plasma to cool until it became favourable for
electrons to combine with
protons and form
hydrogen atoms. This happened at around 3,000 K or when the universe was approximately 379,000 years old (z=1088). At this point, the photons scattered off the now neutral atoms and began to travel freely through space. This process is called or
decoupling (referring to electrons combining with nuclei and to the decoupling of matter and radiation respectively).
The photons have continued cooling ever since; they've now reached 2.725 K and their temperature will continue to drop as long as the universe continues expanding. Accordingly, the radiation from the sky we measure today comes from a spherical surface, called the
surface of last scattering. This represents the collection of points in space (currently around 46 billion light-years from the Earth—see
observable universe) at which the decoupling event happened long enough ago (less than 400,000 years after the Big Bang, 13.7 billion years ago) that the light from that part of space is just reaching observers.
The big bang theory suggests that the cosmic microwave background fills all of observable space, and that most of the radiation energy in the universe is in the cosmic microwave background, which makes up a fraction of roughly 5×10
-5 of the total density of the universe.
Two of the greatest successes of the big bang theory are its prediction of its almost perfect
black body spectrum and its detailed prediction of the anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background. The recent
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe has precisely measured these anisotropies over the whole sky down to angular scales of 0.2 degrees. These can be used to estimate the parameters of the standard
Lambda-CDM model of the big bang. Some information, such as the
shape of the Universe, can be obtained straightforwardly from the cosmic microwave background, while others, such as the
Hubble constant, are not constrained and must be inferred from other measurements.
History
| Timeline of the CMB |
| Important people and dates |
| >1941 |
Andrew McKellar The observational detection of an average bolometric temperature of 2.3 K based on the study of interstellar absorption lines is reported from the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory. |
| >1946 |
Robert Dicke predicts ".. radiation from cosmic matter" at <20 K, but didn't refer to background radiation |
| >1948 |
George Gamow calculates a temperature of 50 K (assuming a 3-billion year old Universe), commenting it ".. is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space", but doesn't mention background radiation. |
| >1948 |
Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman estimate "the temperature in the Universe" at 5 K. Although they don't specifically mention microwave background radiation, it may be inferred. |
| >1950 |
Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman re-re-estimate the temperature at 28 K. |
| >1953 |
George Gamow estimates 7 K. It is noted that the "measurements showed that radiation intensity was independent of either time or direction of observation... it's now clear that Shmaonov did observe the cosmic microwave background at a wavelength of 3.2cm" |
| >1960s |
Robert Dicke re-estimates a MBR (microwave background radiation) temperature of 40 K |
| >1964-65 |
Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson measure the temperature to be approximately 3 K. Robert Dicke, P. J. E. Peebles, P. G. Roll and D. T. Wilkinson interpret this radiation as a signature of the big bang. |
| >1983 |
RELIKT-1 Soviet CMB anisotropy experiment was launched. |
| >1990 |
FIRAS measures the black body form of the CMB spectrum with exquisite precision. |
| >January 1992 |
Scientists who analysed data from RELIKT-1 spacecraft report the discovery of anisotropy at the Moscow astrophysical seminar. |
| >April, 1992 |
Scientists who analysed data from COBE DMR announce the discovery of the primary temperature anisotropy. |
| >1999 |
First measurements of acoustic oscillations in the CMB anisotropy angular power spectrum from the TOCO, BOOMERANG and Maxima Experiments. |
| >2002 |
Polarization discovered by DASI. |
| >2004 |
E-mode polarization spectrum obtained by the CBI.
|
The cosmic microwave background was predicted in 1948 by
George Gamow and
Ralph Alpher, and by Alpher and
Robert Herman. Moreover, Alpher and Herman were able to estimate the temperature of the cosmic microwave background to be 5 K, though two years later, they re-estimated it at 28 K. Although there were several
previous estimates of the temperature of space (see timeline), these suffered from two flaws. First, they were measurements of the
effective temperature of space, and didn't suggest that space was filled with a thermal
Planck spectrum; second, they're dependent on our special place at the edge of the
Milky Way galaxy and didn't suggest the radiation is isotropic. Moreover, they'd yield very different predictions if Earth happened to be located elsewhere in the universe.
The 1948 results of Gamow and Alpher were not widely discussed. However, they were rediscovered by
Yakov Zel'dovich in the early 1960s, and independently predicted by
Robert Dicke at the same time. The first published recognition of the CMB radiation as a detectable phenomenon appeared in a brief paper by
Soviet astrophysicists
A. G. Doroshkevich and
Igor Novikov, in the spring of 1964. In 1964,
David Todd Wilkinson and Peter Roll, Dicke's colleagues at
Princeton University, began constructing a Dicke radiometer to measure the cosmic microwave background. In 1965,
Arno Penzias and
Robert Woodrow Wilson at the
Crawford Hill location of
Bell Telephone Laboratories in nearby
Holmdel Township, New Jersey had built a Dicke radiometer that they intended to use for radio astronomy and satellite communication experiments. Their instrument had an excess 3.5 K
antenna temperature which they couldn't account for. After receiving a telephone call from Crawford Hill, Dicke famously quipped: "Boys, we've been scooped." A meeting between the Princeton and Crawford Hill groups determined that the antenna temperature was indeed due to the microwave background. Penzias and Wilson received the 1978
Nobel Prize in Physics for their discovery.
The interpretation of the cosmic microwave background was a controversial issue in the 1960s with some proponents of the
steady state theory arguing that the microwave background was the result of
scattered starlight from distant galaxies. Using this model, and based on the study of narrow absorption line features in the spectra of stars, the astronomer
Andrew McKellar wrote in 1941: "It can be calculated that the '
rotational temperatureˡ of interstellar space is 2 K." However, during the 1970s the consensus was established that the cosmic microwave background is a remnant of the big bang. This was largely because new measurements at a range of frequencies showed that the spectrum was a thermal,
black body spectrum, a result that the steady state model was unable to reproduce.
Harrison, Peebles and Yu, and Zel'dovich realized that the early universe would have to have inhomogeneities at the level of 10
-4 or 10
−5.
Rashid Sunyaev later calculated the observable imprint that these inhomogeneities would have on the cosmic microwave background. Increasingly stringent limits on the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background were set by ground based experiments, but the anisotropy was first detected by the Differential Microwave Radiometer instrument on the
COBE satellite.
Inspired by the COBE results, a series of ground and balloon-based experiments measured cosmic microwave background anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the next decade. The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the scale of the first acoustic peak, which COBE didn't have sufficient resolution to resolve. The first peak in the anisotropy was tentatively detected by the
Toco experiment and the result was confirmed by the
BOOMERanG and
MAXIMA experiments. These measurements demonstrated that the
Universe is approximately flat and were able to rule out
cosmic strings as a major component of cosmic structure formation, and suggested
cosmic inflation was the right theory of structure formation.
The second peak was tentatively detected by several experiments before being definitively detected by
WMAP, which has also tentatively detected the third peak. Several experiments to improve measurements of the polarization and the microwave background on small angular scales are ongoing. These include DASI, WMAP, BOOMERanG and the
Cosmic Background Imager. Forthcoming experiments include the
Planck satellite,
Atacama Cosmology Telescope,
QUIET telescope and the
South Pole Telescope.
Relationship to the Big Bang
Measurements of the CMB have made the inflationary Big Bang theory the standard model of the earliest eras of the universe. The standard hot big bang model of the universe requires that the initial conditions for the universe are a
Gaussian random field with a nearly
scale invariant or Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum. This is, for example, a prediction of the
cosmic inflation model. This means that the initial state of the universe is random, but in a clearly specified way in which the amplitude of the primeval inhomogeneities is 10
-5. Therefore, meaningful statements about the inhomogeneities in the universe need to be
statistical in nature. This leads to
cosmic variance in which the uncertainties in the variance of the largest scale fluctuations observed in the universe are difficult to accurately compare to theory.
Temperature
The cosmic microwave background radiation and the cosmological
red shift are together regarded as the best available evidence for the
Big Bang (BB) theory. The discovery of the CMB in the mid-1960s curtailed interest in
alternatives such as the
steady state theory. The CMB gives a snapshot of the
Universe when, according to standard cosmology, the temperature dropped enough to allow
electrons and
protons to form
hydrogen atoms, thus making the universe transparent to radiation. When it originated some
400,000 years after the Big Bang — this time period is generally known as the "time of last scattering" or the period of
recombination or
decoupling — the temperature of the Universe was about
3,000 K. This corresponds to an energy of about 0.25
eV, which is much less than the 13.6 eV ionization energy of hydrogen. Since then, the temperature of the radiation has dropped by a factor of roughly 1100 due to the expansion of the Universe. As the universe expands, the CMB photons are
redshifted, making the radiation's temperature
inversely proportional to the Universe's
scale length. For details about the reasoning that the radiation is evidence for the Big Bang, see
Cosmic background radiation of the Big Bang.
Primary anisotropy
The
anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background is divided into two sorts: primary anisotropy – which is due to effects which occur at the last scattering surface and before – and secondary anisotropy – which is due to effects, such as interactions with hot gas or gravitational potentials, between the last scattering surface and the observer.
The structure of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies is principally determined by two effects: acoustic oscillations and diffusion damping (also called collisionless damping or
Silk damping). The acoustic oscillations arise because of a competition in the
photon-
baryon plasma in the early universe. The pressure of the photons tends to erase anisotropies, whereas the gravitational attraction of the baryons – which are moving at speeds much less than the speed of light – makes them tend to collapse to form dense haloes. These two effects compete to create acoustic oscillations which give the microwave background its characteristic peak structure. The peaks correspond, roughly, to resonances in which the photons decouple when a particular mode is at its peak amplitude.
The peaks contain interesting physical signatures. The angular scale of the first peak determines the
curvature of the Universe (but not the
topology of the Universe). The second peak – truly the ratio of the odd peaks to the even peaks – determines the reduced baryon density. The third peak can be used to extract information about the dark matter density.
The locations of the peaks also give important information about the nature of the primordial density perturbations. There are two fundamental types of density perturbations -- called "adiabatic" and "isocurvature."
A general density perturbation is a mixture of these two types, and different theories that purport to explain the primordial density perturbation spectrum predict different mixtures.
- For adiabatic density perturbations, the fractional overdensity in each matter component (baryons, photons ...) is the same. That is, if there's 1% more energy in baryons than average in one spot, then with a pure adiabatic density perturbations there's also 1% more energy in photons, and 1% more energy in neutrinos, than average. Cosmic inflation predicts that the primordial perturbations are adiabatic.
With isocurvature density perturbations, the sum of the fractional overdensities is zero. That is, a perturbation where at some spot there's 1% more energy in baryons than average, 1% more energy in photons than average, and 2% lower energy in neutrinos than average, would be a pure isocurvature perturbation. Cosmic strings would produce mostly isocurvature primordial perturbations.
The CMB spectrum is able to distinguish these two because these two types of perturbations produce different peak locations. Isocurvature density perturbations produce a series of peaks whose angular scales (l-values of the peaks) are roughly in the ratio 1 : 3 : 5 ..., while adiabatic density perturbations produce peaks whose locations are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 ... Observations are consistent with the primordial density perturbations being entirely adiabatic, providing key support for inflation, and ruling out many models of structure formation involving, for example, cosmic strings.
Collisionless damping is caused by two effects, when the treatment of the primordial plasma as a fluid begins to break down:
the increasing mean free path of the photons as the primordial plasma becomes increasingly rarefied in an expanding universe
the finite thickness of the last scattering surface (LSS), which causes the mean free path to increase rapidly during decoupling, even while some Compton scattering is still occurring.
These effects contribute about equally to the suppression of anisotropies on small scales, and give rise to the characteristic exponential damping tail seen in the very small angular scale anisotropies.
The thickness of the LSS refers to the fact that the decoupling of the photons and baryons doesn't happen instantaneously, but instead requires an appreciable fraction of the age of the Universe up to that era. One method to quantify exactly how long this process took uses the photon visibility function (PVF). This function is defined so that, denoting the PVF by P(t), the probability that a CMB photon last scattered between time t and t+dt is given by P(t)dt.
The maximum of the PVF (the time where it's most likely that a given CMB photon last scattered) is known quite precisely. The first-year WMAP results put the time at which P(t) is maximum as 372 +/- 14 kyr. This is often taken as the "time" at which the CMB formed. However, to figure out how long it took the photons and baryons to decouple, we need a measure of the width of the PVF. The WMAP team finds that the PVF is greater than half of its maximum value (the "full width at half maximum", or FWHM) over an interval of 115 +/- 5 kyr. By this measure, decoupling took place over roughly 115,000 years, and when it was complete, the universe was roughly 487,000 years old.
Late time anisotropy
After the creation of the CMB, it's modified by several physical processes collectively referred to as late-time anisotropy or secondary anisotropy. After the emission of the CMB, ordinary matter in the universe was mostly in the form of neutral hydrogen and helium atoms, but from observations of galaxies it seems that most of the volume of the intergalactic medium (IGM) today consists of ionized material (since there are few absorption lines due to hydrogen atoms). This implies a period of reionization in which the material of the universe breaks down into hydrogen ions.
The CMB photons scatter off free charges such as electrons that are not bound in atoms. In an ionized universe, such electrons have been liberated from neutral atoms by ionizing (ultraviolet) radiation. Today these free charges are at sufficiently low density in most of the volume of the Universe that they don't measurably affect the CMB. However, if the IGM was ionized at very early times when the universe was still denser, then there are two main effects on the CMB:
Small scale anisotropies are erased (just as when looking at an object through fog, details of the object appear fuzzy).
The physics of how photons scatter off free electrons (Thomson scattering) induces polarization anisotropies on large angular scales. This large angle polarization is correlated with the large angle temperature perturbation.
Both of these effects have been observed by the WMAP satellite, providing evidence that the universe was ionized at very early times, at a redshift of larger than 17. The detailed provenance of this early ionizing radiation is still a matter of scientific debate. It may have included starlight from the very first population of stars (population III stars), supernovae when these first stars reached the end of their lives, or the ionizing radiation produced by the accretion disks of massive black holes.
The period after the emission of the cosmic microwave background and before the observation of the first stars is semi-humorously referred to by cosmologists as the dark age, and is a period which is under intense study by astronomers (See 21 centimeter radiation).
Other effects that occur between reionization and our observation of the cosmic microwave background which cause anisotropies include the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, in which a cloud of high energy electrons scatters the radiation, transferring some energy to the CMB photons, and the Sachs-Wolfe effect, which causes photons from the cosmic microwave background to be gravitationally redshifted or blue shifted due to changing gravitational fields.
Velocity relative to CMB anisotropy
From the CMB data it's seen that our local group of galaxies (the galactic cluster that includes the Solar System's Milky Way Galaxy) appears to be moving at 627 ± 22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB in the direction of galactic longitude l = 264.4o, b = 48.4o. This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).
The standard interpretation of this temperature variation is a simple velocity redshift and blueshift due to motion relative to the CMB, however alternative cosmological models can explain some fraction of the observed dipole temperature distribution in the CMB (see reference for one example).
Polarization
The cosmic microwave background is polarized at the level of a few microkelvins. There are two types of polarization, called E-modes and B-modes. This is in analogy to electrostatics, in which the electric field (E-field) has a vanishing curl and the magnetic field (B-field) has a vanishing divergence. The E-modes arise naturally from Thomson scattering in an inhomogeneous plasma. The B-modes, which have not been measured and are thought to have an amplitude of at most a 0.1 µK, are not produced from the plasma physics alone. They are a signal from cosmic inflation and are determined by the density of primordial gravitational waves. Detecting the B-modes will be extremely difficult, particularly given that the degree of foreground contamination is unknown, and the weak gravitational lensing signal mixes the relatively strong E-mode signal with the B-mode signal.
Microwave background observations
Subsequent to the discovery of the CMB, hundreds of cosmic microwave background experiments have been conducted to measure and characterize the signatures of the radiation. The most famous experiment is probably the NASA Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite that orbited in 1989–1996 and which detected and quantified the large scale anisotropies at the limit of its detection capabilities. Inspired by the initial COBE results of an extremely isotropic and homogeneous background, a series of ground- and balloon-based experiments quantified CMB anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the next decade. The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the angular scale of the first acoustic peak, for which COBE didn't have sufficient resolution. These measurements were able to rule out cosmic strings as the leading theory of cosmic structure formation, and suggested cosmic inflation was the right theory. During the 1990s, the first peak was measured with increasing sensitivity and by 2000 the BOOMERanG experiment reported that the highest power fluctuations occur at scales of apporoximately one degree. Together with other cosmological data, these results implied that the geometry of the Universe is flat. A number of ground-based interferometers provided measurements of the fluctuations with higher accuracy over the next three years, including the Very Small Array,
Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI) and the Cosmic Background Imager (CBI). DASI made the first detection of the polarization of the CMB and the CBI provided the first E-mode polarization spectrum with compelling evidence that it's out of phase with the T-mode spectrum.
In June 2001, NASA launched a second CMB space mission, WMAP, to make much more precise measurements of the large scale anisotropies over the full sky. The first results from this mission, disclosed in 2003, were detailed measurements of the angular power spectrum to below degree scales, tightly constraining various cosmological parameters. The results are broadly consistent with those expected from cosmic inflation as well as various other competing theories, and are available in detail at NASA's data center for Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) (see links below). Although WMAP provided very accurate measurements of the large angular-scale fluctuations in the CMB (structures about as large in the sky as the moon), it didn't have the angular resolution to measure the smaller scale fluctuations which had been observed using previous ground-based interferometers.
A third space mission, the Planck Surveyor, is to be launched in 2008. Planck employs both HEMT radiometers as well as bolometer technology and will measure the CMB on smaller scales than WMAP. Unlike the previous two space missions, Planck is a collaboration between NASA and ESA (the European Space Agency). Its detectors got a trial run at the Antarctic Viper telescope as ACBAR (Arcminute Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver) experiment – which has produced the most precise measurements at small angular scales to date – and at the Archeops balloon telescope.
Additional ground-based instruments such as the South Pole Telescope in Antarctica and the proposed Clover Project, Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the QUIET telescope in Chile will provide additional data not available from satellite observations, possibly including the B-mode polarization.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Cosmic Background Radiation'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://cosmic_microwave_background_radiation.totallyexplained.com">Cosmic microwave background radiation Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
